↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Lyme disease: the next decade

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 2,024)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
12 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Lyme disease: the next decade
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, January 2011
DOI 10.2147/idr.s15653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael B Stricker, Lorraine Johnson

Abstract

Although Lyme disease remains a controversial illness, recent events have created an unprecedented opportunity to make progress against this serious tick-borne infection. Evidence presented during the legally mandated review of the restrictive Lyme guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has confirmed the potential for persistent infection with the Lyme spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, as well as the complicating role of tick-borne coinfections such as Babesia, Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, and Bartonella species associated with failure of short-course antibiotic therapy. Furthermore, renewed interest in the role of cell wall-deficient (CWD) forms in chronic bacterial infection and progress in understanding the molecular mechanisms of biofilms has focused attention on these processes in chronic Lyme disease. Recognition of the importance of CWD forms and biofilms in persistent B. burgdorferi infection should stimulate pharmaceutical research into new antimicrobial agents that target these mechanisms of chronic infection with the Lyme spirochete. Concurrent clinical implementation of proteomic screening offers a chance to correct significant deficiencies in Lyme testing. Advances in these areas have the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease in the coming decade.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Russia 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 125 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 22%
Student > Bachelor 24 18%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 10 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 13 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,167,464
of 25,248,299 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#50
of 2,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,755
of 193,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,248,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,024 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.