| Title |
Driving deaths and injuries post-9/11
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s27049 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raywat Deonandan, Amber Backwell |
| Abstract |
In the days immediately following the terror attacks of 9/11, thousands of Americans chose to drive rather than to fly. We analyzed highway accident data to determine whether or not the number of fatalities and injuries following 9/11 differed from those in the same time period in 2000 and 2002. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 31 | 31% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Belarus | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 58 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 98 | 99% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 33% |
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 2 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#406,090
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#30
of 1,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,983
of 248,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.