↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Update on the management of ulcerative colitis: treatment and maintenance approaches focused on MMX® mesalamine

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Update on the management of ulcerative colitis: treatment and maintenance approaches focused on MMX® mesalamine
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, July 2012
DOI 10.2147/cpaa.s26556
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kavinderjit Nanda, Alan C Moss

Abstract

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the colon that typically manifests as diarrhea, abdominal pain, and bloody stool. Complications, such as colorectal cancer and extraintestinal manifestations, may also develop. The goals of management are to induce and maintain clinical remission and to screen for complications of this disease. Mesalamine is a 5-aminosalicylic acid compound that is the first-line therapy to induce and maintain clinical remission in patients with mild-to-moderate UC. For patients who are refractory to mesalamine or have more severe disease, steroids, azathioprine/mercaptopurine, cyclosporine, or infliximab may be used, induce and/or maintain remission. The various formulations of mesalamine available are primarily differentiated by the methods of delivery of the active compound of the drug to the colon. Mesalamine with Multi-Matrix System(®) (MMX) technology (Cosmo SpA, Milan, Italy) is an oral (1.2 g), once-daily tablet formulation of mesalamine used for the treatment of UC (Lialda(®) or Mezavant(®), Shire Pharmaceuticals Inc, Wayne, PA). In clinical studies, MMX mesalamine (taken as a once-daily dose of 2.4 or 4.8 g) effectively induced and maintained clinical remission in patients with active mild-to-moderate UC. The overall safety profile of MMX mesalamine is similar to other oral mesalamine formulations. The use of such once-daily formulations has led to intense interest in whether simplified pill regimens can improve patient adherence to mesalamine therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
India 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 11%
Unspecified 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2012.
All research outputs
#21,011,157
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#148
of 180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,184
of 177,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.