↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Practical aspects of inhaler use in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the primary care setting

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Practical aspects of inhaler use in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the primary care setting
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, July 2012
DOI 10.2147/copd.s32674
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara P Yawn, Gene L Colice, Rick Hodder

Abstract

Sustained bronchodilation using inhaled medications in moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) grades 2 and 3 (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines) has been shown to have clinical benefits on long-term symptom control and quality of life, with possible additional benefits on disease progression and longevity. Aggressive diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic COPD is an integral and pivotal part of COPD management, which usually begins with primary care physicians. The current standard of care involves the use of one or more inhaled bronchodilators, and depending on COPD severity and phenotype, inhaled corticosteroids. There is a wide range of inhaler devices available for delivery of inhaled medications, but suboptimal inhaler use is a common problem that can limit the clinical effectiveness of inhaled therapies in the real-world setting. Patients' comorbidities, other physical or mental limitations, and the level of inhaler technique instruction may limit proper inhaler use. This paper presents information that can overcome barriers to proper inhaler use, including issues in device selection, steps in correct technique for various inhaler devices, and suggestions for assessing and monitoring inhaler techniques. Ensuring proper inhaler technique can maximize drug effectiveness and aid clinical management at all grades of COPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 36 27%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,871,539
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#144
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,004
of 176,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.