↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pancreatic cancer survival in central and northern Denmark from 1998 through 2009: a population-based cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Pancreatic cancer survival in central and northern Denmark from 1998 through 2009: a population-based cohort study
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, July 2011
DOI 10.2147/clep.s20611
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton, Rune Erichsen, Frank V Mortensen, Sarunas Dikinis, Mette Nørgaard, Jacob Jacobsen

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer has a relatively low incidence but ranks fourth among cancer- related deaths in western countries. In Denmark, cancer survival generally is lower than in other countries with comparable health care systems. As a result, in 2000, a national strategy to improve cancer survival was introduced. Here we examine time trends in survival and relative mortality among pancreatic cancer patients, using Danish population and medical databases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Other 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Librarian 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2011.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#732
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,912
of 127,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.