↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Optimal management of urinary tract infections in older people

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Optimal management of urinary tract infections in older people
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2011
DOI 10.2147/cia.s13423
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise A Beveridge, Peter G Davey, Gabby Phillips, Marion ET McMurdo

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTI) occur frequently in older people. Unfortunately, UTI is commonly overdiagnosed and overtreated on the basis of nonspecific clinical signs and symptoms. The diagnosis of a UTI in the older patient requires the presence of new urinary symptoms, with or without systemic symptoms. Urinalysis is commonly used to diagnose infection in this population, however, the evidence for its use is limited. There is overwhelming evidence that asymptomatic bacteriuria should not be treated. Catheter associated urinary tract infection accounts for a significant amount of hospital-associated infection. Indwelling urinary catheters should be avoided where possible and alternatives sought. The use of narrow spectrum antimicrobial agents for urinary tract infection is advocated. Local guidelines are now widely used to reflect local resistance patterns and available agents. Guidelines need to be updated to reflect changes in antimicrobial prescribing and a move from broad to narrow spectrum antimicrobials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Unknown 208 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 19%
Student > Master 27 12%
Other 25 11%
Student > Postgraduate 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 39 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 45 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,285,710
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#247
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,119
of 122,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them