Title |
Causal diagrams and the logic of matched case-control studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/clep.s31271 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eyal Shahar, Doron J Shahar |
Abstract |
It is tempting to assume that confounding bias is eliminated by choosing controls that are identical to the cases on the matched confounder(s). We used causal diagrams to explain why such matching not only fails to remove confounding bias, but also adds colliding bias, and why both types of bias are removed by conditioning on the matched confounder(s). As in some publications, we trace the logic of matching to a possible tradeoff between effort and variance, not between effort and bias. Lastly, we explain why the analysis of a matched case-control study - regardless of the method of matching - is not conceptually different from that of an unmatched study. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 17% |
Ireland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
Professor | 6 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 12% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 3 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 46% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |