| Title |
The effect of a cognitive-motor intervention on voluntary step execution under single and dual task conditions in older adults: a randomized controlled pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s32558 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giuseppe Pichierri, Amos Coppe, Silvio Lorenzetti, Kurt Murer, Eling D de Bruin |
| Abstract |
This randomized controlled pilot study aimed to explore whether a cognitive-motor exercise program that combines traditional physical exercise with dance video gaming can improve the voluntary stepping responses of older adults under attention demanding dual task conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 340 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 12% |
| Researcher | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 18% |
| Unknown | 98 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 51 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 6% |
| Psychology | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 17% |
| Unknown | 113 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,535
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,620
of 177,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.