The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Physiological effects beyond the significant gain in muscle mass in sarcopenic elderly men: evidence from a randomized clinical trial using a protein-rich food
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s32356 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heliodoro Alemán-Mateo, Liliana Macías, Julián Esparza-Romero, Humberto Astiazaran-García, Ana Luz Blancas |
| Abstract |
Sarcopenia is strongly associated with an inadequate intake of dietary protein. Dietary protein supplementation boosts muscle-protein synthesis and increases muscle mass in the elderly. This study tested whether adding a protein-rich food, ricotta cheese, to the habitual diet increased total appendicular skeletal muscle mass and strength in elderly people. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 225 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 63 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 23 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 71 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,201,478
of 26,564,146 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#748
of 1,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,992
of 177,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,564,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.