| Title |
Comparison of multisensory and strength training for postural control in the elderly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s27747 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fábio Marcon Alfieri, Marcelo Riberto, Lucila Silveira Gatz, Carla Paschoal Corsi Ribeiro, José Augusto Fernandes Lopes, Linamara Rizzo Battistella |
| Abstract |
The objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy of multisensory versus muscle strengthening to improve postural control in healthy community-dwelling elderly. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 44 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 31 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,535
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,037
of 176,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.