↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The impact of hearing loss on the quality of life of elderly adults

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 1,968)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
682 Mendeley
Title
The impact of hearing loss on the quality of life of elderly adults
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2012
DOI 10.2147/cia.s26059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Ciorba, Chiara Bianchini, Stefano Pelucchi, Antonio Pastore

Abstract

Hearing loss is the most common sensory deficit in the elderly, and it is becoming a severe social and health problem. Especially in the elderly, hearing loss can impair the exchange of information, thus significantly impacting everyday life, causing loneliness, isolation, dependence, and frustration, as well as communication disorders. Due to the aging of the population in the developed world, presbycusis is a growing problem that has been reported to reduce quality of life (QoL). Progression of presbycusis cannot be remediated; therefore, optimal management of this condition not only requires early recognition and rehabilitation, but it also should include an evaluation of QoL status and its assessment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 682 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 672 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 104 15%
Student > Master 95 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 10%
Researcher 58 9%
Student > Postgraduate 45 7%
Other 112 16%
Unknown 199 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 160 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 95 14%
Psychology 40 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 5%
Social Sciences 26 4%
Other 106 16%
Unknown 224 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#217,305
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#23
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#941
of 179,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.