| Title |
Association of leisure-time physical activity with cognition by apolipoprotein-E genotype in persons aged 60 years and over: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-III)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s26794 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas O Obisesan, Nisser Umar, Nivedh Paluvoi, Richard F Gillum |
| Abstract |
To test the hypothesis that aerobic-related leisure-time physical activity (PA) is associated with better cognitive function and that the effect varies among apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,550
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,874
of 250,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.