↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in aging and older adults: comprehensive analysis of the evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in aging and older adults: comprehensive analysis of the evidence
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2012
DOI 10.2147/cia.s25215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre-Olivier Lang, Aline Mendes, Jennifer Socquet, Noémie Assir, Sheila Govind, Richard Aspinall

Abstract

Foremost amongst the diseases preventable by vaccination is influenza. Worldwide, influenza virus infection is associated with serious adverse events leading to hospitalization, debilitating complications, and death in elderly individuals. Immunization is considered to be the cornerstone for preventing these adverse health outcomes, and vaccination programs are timed to optimize protection during the annual influenza season. Trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccines are believed to be both effective and cost-saving; however, in spite of widespread influenza vaccination programs, rates of hospitalization for acute respiratory illness and cardiovascular diseases have been increasing in this population during recent annual influenza seasons. From meta-analyses summarizing estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness from available observational clinical studies, this review aims to examine how effective current influenza vaccine strategies are in the aging and older adult population and to analyze which are the most important biases that interfere with measurements of influenza vaccine effectiveness. Furthermore, consideration is given to strategies that should be adopted in order to optimize influenza vaccine effectiveness in the face of immune exhaustion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 158 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Master 20 12%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 13%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 44 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,723,170
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#187
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,820
of 254,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.