The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Demography and Clinical Features of Chalazion Among Patients Seen at a Multi-Tier Eye Care Network in India: An Electronic Medical Records Driven Big Data Analysis Report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s263146 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony Vipin Das, Tarjani Vivek Dave |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 28% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,048,620
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,093
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,325
of 433,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#19
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.