| Title |
Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Hydrodissection for Pain Management: Rationale, Methods, Current Literature, and Theoretical Mechanisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s247208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hei Stanley Lam, Chen-Yu Hung, Yi-Pin Chiang, Kentaro Onishi, Daniel Chiung Jui Su, Thomas B Clark, K Dean Reeves |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 43% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,171,804
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#248
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,608
of 427,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.