↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nanoinformatics: a new area of research in nanomedicine

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Nanoinformatics: a new area of research in nanomedicine
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s24582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor Maojo, Martin Fritts, Diana de la Iglesia, Raul E Cachau, Miguel Garcia-Remesal, Joyce A Mitchell, Casimir Kulikowski

Abstract

Over a decade ago, nanotechnologists began research on applications of nanomaterials for medicine. This research has revealed a wide range of different challenges, as well as many opportunities. Some of these challenges are strongly related to informatics issues, dealing, for instance, with the management and integration of heterogeneous information, defining nomenclatures, taxonomies and classifications for various types of nanomaterials, and research on new modeling and simulation techniques for nanoparticles. Nanoinformatics has recently emerged in the USA and Europe to address these issues. In this paper, we present a review of nanoinformatics, describing its origins, the problems it addresses, areas of interest, and examples of current research initiatives and informatics resources. We suggest that nanoinformatics could accelerate research and development in nanomedicine, as has occurred in the past in other fields. For instance, biomedical informatics served as a fundamental catalyst for the Human Genome Project, and other genomic and -omics projects, as well as the translational efforts that link resulting molecular-level research to clinical problems and findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 113 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 24%
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 14%
Chemistry 16 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Computer Science 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 25 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,659,861
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#355
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,503
of 176,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#8
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.