↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparative Effectiveness Assessment of Two Powered Surgical Stapling Platforms in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Matched Study

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Comparative Effectiveness Assessment of Two Powered Surgical Stapling Platforms in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Matched Study
Published in
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, July 2020
DOI 10.2147/mder.s256237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Logan Rawlins, Barbara H Johnson, Stephen S Johnston, Nivesh Elangovanraaj, Mohit Bhandari, Ricardo V Cohen, Karl Peter Rheinwalt, Raymond Fryrear, Sanjoy Roy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Unknown 12 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2020.
All research outputs
#22,835,295
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#287
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#374,238
of 432,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.