| Title |
Anatomic considerations for central venous cannulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/rmhp.s10383 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael P Bannon, Stephanie F Heller, Mariela Rivera |
| Abstract |
Central venous cannulation is a commonly performed procedure which facilitates resuscitation, nutritional support, and long-term vascular access. Mechanical complications most often occur during insertion and are intimately related to the anatomic relationship of the central veins. Working knowledge of surface and deep anatomy minimizes complications. Use of surface anatomic landmarks to orient the deep course of cannulating needle tracts appropriately comprises the crux of complication avoidance. The authors describe use of surface landmarks to facilitate safe placement of internal jugular, subclavian, and femoral venous catheters. The role of real-time sonography as a safety-enhancing adjunct is reviewed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 18% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 39% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 22% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 48 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,536,735
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#48
of 741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,029
of 121,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.