| Title |
Interventions Incorporating Therapeutic Alliance to Improve Hemodialysis Treatment Adherence in Black Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) in the United States: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s260684 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte Blumrosen, Russom Desta, Kerri L Cavanaugh, Heather E Laferriere, Marino A Bruce, Keith C Norris, Derek M Griffith, Ebele M Umeukeje |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 46% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,179,062
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#254
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,836
of 428,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.