| Title |
Short-Term Effect of Self-Selected Training Intensity on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Older Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s260134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Júlio Sócrates, Rodrigo Alberto Vieira Browne, Geovani Araújo Dantas Macêdo, Maria Beatriz Fonseca Araújo, Ronildo Paulo-Pereira, Ludmila Lucena Pereira Cabral, Bruno Erick Barros Lucena, Luiz Fernando Farias-Junior, Eduardo Caldas Costa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 55 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,267,700
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#781
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,642
of 427,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#10
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.