↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nalbuphine versus Midazolam as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Nalbuphine versus Midazolam as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, June 2020
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s242545
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olfat Abdelmoniem Ibrahem Amin, Mohamed Abdel-moniem Ibrahem, Dina Abdelhameed Elsadek Salem

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 45%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#20,638,370
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,621
of 1,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340,166
of 397,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#48
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.