| Title |
Practice Advisory on the Appropriate Use of NSAIDs in Primary Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s247781 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kok Yuen Ho, Mary S Cardosa, Sumapa Chaiamnuay, Rudy Hidayat, Huynh Quang Tri Ho, Ozlan Kamil, Sabarul A Mokhtar, Ken Nakata, Sandra V Navarra, Van Hung Nguyen, Rizaldy Pinzon, Shuichi Tsuruoka, Heng Boon Yim, Ernest Choy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Colombia | 1 | 20% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,371,766
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#733
of 1,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,856
of 398,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#13
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.