| Title |
Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy Initially Presenting as Erythema Nodosum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inflammation Research, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jir.s270114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuni Ying, Sheng Li, Shunli Tang, Qingmiao Sun, Deren Fang, Yali Li, Dingxian Zhu, Hong Fang, Jianjun Qiao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,624,448
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inflammation Research
#351
of 825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,962
of 398,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inflammation Research
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.