↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Oral pressure therapy for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: clinical feasibility

Overview of attention for article published in Nature and science of sleep, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Oral pressure therapy for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: clinical feasibility
Published in
Nature and science of sleep, May 2013
DOI 10.2147/nss.s44736
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehran Farid-Moayer, Lawrence C Siegel, Jed Black

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 3 16%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 53%
Engineering 2 11%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Nature and science of sleep
#300
of 629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,673
of 204,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature and science of sleep
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.