| Title |
Clinical differences between influenza A (H1N1) virus and respiratory infection between the two waves in 2009 and 2010
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s34940 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Zarogoulidis, Anastasios Tsiotsios, Eirini Terzi, Konstantinos Porpodis, Ioannis Kioumis, Nikolaos Courcoutsakis, Theodoros Constantinidis, Efstratios Maltezos, Konstantinos Zarogoulidis, Anastasios Kallianos, Georgia Trakada, Aggeliki Rapti, Nikoalos Machairiotis, Sakas, Stylianaki, Dimitrios Glaros |
| Abstract |
The purpose of the present retrospective study was to examine the clinical differences between patients hospitalized with H1N1 virus and those hospitalized with nonvirus respiratory tract infection in 2009 and 2010. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Librarian | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 20% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2012.
All research outputs
#13,365,440
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#432
of 1,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,716
of 164,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.