↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Muscle function in COPD: a complex interplay

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
Muscle function in COPD: a complex interplay
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2012
DOI 10.2147/copd.s28247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna V Donaldson, Matthew Maddocks, Dario Martolini, Michael I Polkey, William D-C Man

Abstract

The skeletal muscles play an essential role in life, providing the mechanical basis for respiration and movement. Skeletal muscle dysfunction is prevalent in all stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and significantly influences symptoms, functional capacity, health related quality of life, health resource usage and even mortality. Furthermore, in contrast to the lungs, the skeletal muscles are potentially remedial with existing therapy, namely exercise-training. This review summarizes clinical and laboratory observations of the respiratory and peripheral skeletal muscles (in particular the diaphragm and quadriceps), and current understanding of the underlying etiological processes. As further progress is made in the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of skeletal muscle dysfunction, new pharmacological therapies are likely to emerge to treat this important extra-pulmonary manifestation of COPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 196 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 55 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 7%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 71 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2013.
All research outputs
#6,716,471
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#745
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,293
of 179,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.