↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Body integrity identity disorder crosses culture: case reports in the Japanese and Chinese literature

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Body integrity identity disorder crosses culture: case reports in the Japanese and Chinese literature
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s102932
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rianne M Blom, Nienke C Vulink, Sija J van der Wal, Takashi Nakamae, Zhonglin Tan, Eske M Derks, Damiaan Denys

Abstract

Body integrity identity disorder (BIID) is a condition in which people do not perceive a part of their body as their own, which results in a strong desire for amputation or paralyzation. The disorder is likely to be congenital due to its very early onset. The English literature describes only Western patients with BIID, suggesting that the disorder might be merely prevalent in the West. To scrutinize this assumption, and to extend our knowledge of the etiology of BIID, it is important to trace cases with BIID in non-Western populations. Our objective was to review Chinese and Japanese literature on BIID to learn about its presence in populations with a different genetic background. A systematic literature search was performed in databases containing Japanese and Chinese research, published in the respective languages. Five Japanese articles of BIID were identified which described two cases of BIID, whereas in the Chinese databases only BIID-related conditions were found. This article reports some preliminary evidence that BIID is also present in non-Western countries. However, making general statements about the biological background of the disorder is hampered by the extremely low number of cases found. This low number possibly resulted from the extreme secrecy associated with the disorder, perhaps even more so in Asian countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 16%
Professor 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 25%
Neuroscience 4 13%
Psychology 4 13%
Philosophy 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,572,065
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#841
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,703
of 353,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#31
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.