| Title |
Lupeol Inhibits Growth and Migration in Two Human Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines by Suppression of Wnt–β-Catenin Pathway [Retraction]
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ott.s276550 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yihao Wang, Dan Hong, Yuqin Qian, Xuezi Tu, Keke Wang, Xianhong Yang, Sijia Shao, Xinlong Kong, Zhefeng Lou, Longjin Jin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,534,407
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,155
of 3,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,001
of 428,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#21
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,013 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.