↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in the management of coronary artery disease: technology and clinical update

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in the management of coronary artery disease: technology and clinical update
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s79632
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rine Nakanishi, Mathew J Budoff

Abstract

After a decade of clinical use of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) to evaluate the anatomic severity of coronary artery disease, new methods of deriving functional information from CCTA have been developed. These methods utilize the anatomic information provided by CCTA in conjunction with computational fluid dynamics to calculate fractional flow reserve (FFR) values from CCTA image data sets. Computed tomography-derived FFR (CT-FFR) enables the identification of lesion-specific drop noninvasively. A three-dimensional CT-FFR modeling technique, which provides FFR values throughout the coronary tree (HeartFlow FFRCT analysis), has been validated against measured FFR and is now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for clinical use. This technique requires off-site supercomputer analysis. More recently, a one-dimensional computational analysis technique (Siemens cFFR), which can be performed on on-site workstations, has been developed and is currently under investigation. This article reviews CT-FFR technology and clinical evidence for its use in stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 14%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 36%
Engineering 11 11%
Computer Science 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#243
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,692
of 353,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.