↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Chemically cross-linked silk fibroin hydrogel with enhanced elastic properties, biodegradability, and biocompatibility

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Chemically cross-linked silk fibroin hydrogel with enhanced elastic properties, biodegradability, and biocompatibility
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s106467
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Hee Kim, Won Ho Park

Abstract

In this study, the synthesis of silk fibroin (SF) hydrogel via chemical cross-linking reactions of SF due to gamma-ray (γ-ray) irradiation was investigated, as were the resultant hydrogel's properties. Two different hydrogels were investigated: physically cross-linked SF hydrogel and chemically cross-linked SF hydrogel irradiated at different doses of γ-rays. The effects of the irradiation dose and SF concentration on the hydrogelation of SF were examined. The chemically cross-linked SF hydrogel was compared with the physically cross-linked one with regard to secondary structure and gel strength. Furthermore, the swelling behavior, crystallinity, and biodegradation of the SF hydrogels were characterized. To assay cell proliferation, the cell viability of human mesenchymal stem cells on the lyophilized SF hydrogel scaffolds was evaluated, and no significant cytotoxicity against human mesenchymal stem cells was observed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 115 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 37 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 11%
Materials Science 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Chemistry 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 44 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,387,227
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,492
of 4,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,566
of 353,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#40
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.