| Title |
Preserving Mobility in Older Adults with Physical Frailty and Sarcopenia: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations for Physical Activity Interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s253535 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maxime Billot, Riccardo Calvani, Annele Urtamo, Juan Luis Sánchez-Sánchez, Cecilia Ciccolari-Micaldi, Milan Chang, Regina Roller-Wirnsberger, Gerhard Wirnsberger, Alan Sinclair, Nieves Vaquero-Pinto, Satu Jyväkorpi, Hanna Öhman, Timo Strandberg, Jos M G A Schols, Annemie M W J Schols, Nick Smeets, Eva Topinkova, Helena Michalkova, Anna Rita Bonfigli, Fabrizia Lattanzio, Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas, Hélio Coelho-Júnior, Marianna Broccatelli, Maria Elena D’Elia, Damiano Biscotti, Emanuele Marzetti, Ellen Freiberger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 22% |
| Australia | 6 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Mexico | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Uganda | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 58% |
| Scientists | 14 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 328 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 12% |
| Researcher | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 15% |
| Unknown | 152 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 17 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 167 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,061,373
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#99
of 1,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,769
of 427,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.