↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Orthogeriatric care: improving patient outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Orthogeriatric care: improving patient outcomes
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/cia.s72436
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco José Tarazona-Santabalbina, Ángel Belenguer-Varea, Eduardo Rovira, David Cuesta-Peredó

Abstract

Hip fractures are a very serious socio-economic problem in western countries. Since the 1950s, orthogeriatric units have introduced improvements in the care of geriatric patients admitted to hospital because of hip fractures. During this period, these units have reduced mean hospital stays, number of complications, and both in-hospital mortality and mortality over the middle term after hospital discharge, along with improvements in the quality of care and a reduction in costs. Likewise, a recent clinical trial has reported greater functional gains among the affected patients. Studies in this field have identified the prognostic factors present upon admission or manifesting themselves during admission and that increase the risk of patient mortality or disability. In addition, improved care afforded by orthogeriatric units has proved to reduce costs. Nevertheless, a number of management issues remain to be clarified, such as the optimum anesthetic, analgesic, and thromboprophylactic protocols; the type of diagnostic and therapeutic approach best suited to patients with cognitive problems; or the efficiency of the programs used in convalescence units or in home rehabilitation care. Randomized clinical trials are needed to consolidate the evidence in this regard.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Other 13 9%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 42 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 46 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,496,331
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#612
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,659
of 353,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#17
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.