↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Improving doctor-patient communication: content validity examination of a novel urinary system-simulating physical model

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Improving doctor-patient communication: content validity examination of a novel urinary system-simulating physical model
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, December 2016
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s123468
Pubmed ID
Authors

WenGang Hu, YaJun Song, Xiao Zhong, JiaYu Feng, PingXian Wang, ChiBing Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 21 24%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 30 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 30 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 30 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,064
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,646
of 416,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#23
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.