↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Development of ceftazidime resistance in an acute Burkholderia pseudomallei infection

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Development of ceftazidime resistance in an acute Burkholderia pseudomallei infection
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, August 2012
DOI 10.2147/idr.s35529
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek S Sarovich, Erin P Price, Direk Limmathurotsakul, James M Cook, Alex T Von Schulze, Spenser R Wolken, Paul Keim, Sharon J Peacock, Talima Pearson

Abstract

Burkholderia pseudomallei, a bacterium that causes the disease melioidosis, is intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics. First-line antibiotic therapy for treating melioidosis is usually the synthetic β-lactam, ceftazidime (CAZ), as almost all B. pseudomallei strains are susceptible to this drug. However, acquired CAZ resistance can develop in vivo during treatment with CAZ, which can lead to mortality if therapy is not switched to a different drug in a timely manner. Serial B. pseudomallei isolates obtained from an acute Thai melioidosis patient infected by a CAZ susceptible strain, who ultimately succumbed to infection despite being on CAZ therapy for the duration of their infection, were analyzed. Isolates that developed CAZ resistance due to a proline to serine change at position 167 in the β-lactamase PenA were identified. Importantly, these CAZ resistant isolates remained sensitive to the alternative melioidosis treatments; namely, amoxicillin-clavulanate, imipenem, and meropenem. Lastly, real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assays capable of rapidly identifying CAZ resistance in B. pseudomallei isolates at the position 167 mutation site were developed. The ability to rapidly identify the emergence of CAZ resistant B. pseudomallei populations in melioidosis patients will allow timely alterations in treatment strategies, thereby improving patient outcomes for this serious disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Thailand 2 3%
Malaysia 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,110,957
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#1,156
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,691
of 179,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.