↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Erectile Dysfunction After Surgical Treatment of Lung Cancer: Real-World Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Erectile Dysfunction After Surgical Treatment of Lung Cancer: Real-World Evidence
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, September 2020
DOI 10.2147/clep.s264439
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming-Szu Hung, Yi-Chuan Chen, Tsung-Yu Huang, Dong-Ru Ho, Chuan-Pin Lee, Pau-Chung Chen, Yao-Hsu Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,633,726
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#485
of 730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,619
of 399,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.