The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Effective prevention of sorafenib-induced hand–foot syndrome by dried-bonito broth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Management and Research, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cmar.s159370 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenya Kamimura, Yoko Shinagawa-Kobayashi, Ryo Goto, Kohei Ogawa, Takeshi Yokoo, Akira Sakamaki, Satoshi Abe, Hiroteru Kamimura, Takeshi Suda, Hiroshi Baba, Takayuki Tanaka, Yoshizu Nozawa, Naoto Koyama, Masaaki Takamura, Hirokazu Kawai, Satoshi Yamagiwa, Yutaka Aoyagi, Shuji Terai |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Librarian | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,523,416
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#340
of 2,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,587
of 330,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#13
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.