| Title |
Animal models of asthma: utility and limitations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jaa.s121092 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcelo Vivolo Aun, Rafael Bonamichi-Santos, Fernanda Magalhães Arantes-Costa, Jorge Kalil, Pedro Giavina-Bianchi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 327 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 20% |
| Researcher | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 100 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 40 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 37 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 10% |
| Unknown | 108 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,246,141
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#51
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,227
of 344,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.