Title |
Comparison of efficacy and safety between two different irbesartan, generic vs branded, in the treatment of Korean patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase IV clinical study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s172046 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Seung Hwan Han, Gyu Chul Oh, Hyuck Moon Kwon, Chang Gyu Park, In Jai Kim, Gyo-Seung Hwang, Byung Su Yoo, Seong Hoon Park, Kwang Je Lee, Hyo-soo Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 26% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#1,105
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,327
of 445,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#20
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.