↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Prevalence of human norovirus and Clostridium difficile coinfections in adult hospitalized patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of human norovirus and Clostridium difficile coinfections in adult hospitalized patients
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/clep.s106495
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janelle N Stokely, Sandra Niendorf, Stefan Taube, Marina Hoehne, Vincent B Young, Mary AM Rogers, Christiane E Wobus

Abstract

Human norovirus (HuNoV) and Clostridium difficile are common causes of infectious gastroenteritis in adults in the US. However, limited information is available regarding HuNoV and C. difficile coinfections. Our study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of HuNoV and C. difficile coinfections among adult patients in a hospital setting and disease symptomatology. For a cross-sectional analysis, 384 fecal samples were tested for the presence of C. difficile toxins from patients (n=290), whom the provider suspected of C. difficile infections. Subsequent testing was then performed for HuNoV genogroups I and II. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to determine symptoms more frequently associated with coinfections. The final cohort consisted of the following outcome groups: C. difficile (n=196), C. difficile + HuNoV coinfection (n=40), HuNoV only (n=12), and neither (n=136). Coinfected patients were more likely to develop nausea, gas, and abdominal pain and were more likely to seek treatment in the winter season compared with individuals not infected or infected with either pathogen alone. Our study revealed that patients with coinfection are more likely to experience certain gastrointestinal symptoms, in particular abdominal pain, suggesting an increased severity of disease symptomatology in coinfected patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Professor 4 13%
Other 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 6 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,426,905
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#107
of 720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,228
of 339,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.