The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Nebulised Gadolinium-Based Nanoparticles for a Multimodal Approach: Quantitative and Qualitative Lung Distribution Using Magnetic Resonance and Scintigraphy Imaging in Isolated Ventilated Porcine Lungs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s260640 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoann Montigaud, Jérémie Pourchez, Lara Leclerc, Olivier Tillement, Anthony Clotagatide, Clémence Bal, Noël Pinaud, Nobuyasu Ichinose, Bei Zhang, Sophie Perinel, François Lux, Yannick Crémillieux, Nathalie Prevot |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,547,373
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,524
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,663
of 424,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#18
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.