↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pain and Evil: From Local Nociception to Misery Following Social Harm

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Pain and Evil: From Local Nociception to Misery Following Social Harm
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, May 2020
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s236507
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariagrazia D’Ippolito, Adriano Purgato, Maria Gabriella Buzzi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 3 4%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 29 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Psychology 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 32 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2021.
All research outputs
#18,753,253
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,420
of 1,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,146
of 378,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#36
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.