↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Ferumoxytol: a silver lining in the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease or another dark cloud?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Blood Medicine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Ferumoxytol: a silver lining in the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease or another dark cloud?
Published in
Journal of Blood Medicine, August 2012
DOI 10.2147/jbm.s29204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Barton Pai, Adinoyi O Garba

Abstract

Intravenous iron therapy is pivotal in the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease to optimize the response of hemoglobin to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Intravenous iron use in patients with chronic kidney disease is on the rise. Recent clinical trial data prompting safety concerns regarding the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents has stimulated new US Food and Drug Administration label changes and restrictions for these agents, and has encouraged more aggressive use of intravenous iron. The currently available intravenous iron products differ with regard to the stability of the iron-carbohydrate complex and potential to induce hypersensitivity reactions. Ferumoxytol is a newer large molecular weight intravenous iron formulation that is a colloidal iron oxide nanoparticle suspension coated with polyglucose sorbitol carboxymethyl ether. Ferumoxytol has robust iron-carbohydrate complex stability with minimal dissociation or appearance of free iron in the serum, allowing the drug to be given in relatively large doses with a rapid rate of administration. Clinical trials have demonstrated the superior efficacy of ferumoxytol versus oral iron with minimal adverse effects. However, recent postmarketing data have demonstrated a risk of hypersensitivity that has prompted new changes to the product information mandated by the Food and Drug Administration. Additionally, the long-term safety of this agent has not been evaluated, and its place in the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease has not been fully elucidated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 5%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Neuroscience 5 12%
Engineering 4 10%
Chemistry 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,039,503
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#104
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,600
of 179,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.