↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

miR-135a acts as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer in part by targeting KIFC1

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
miR-135a acts as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer in part by targeting KIFC1
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s105736
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuanlei Zhang, Xiaoqi Chen, Xinju Chen, Xinting Wang, Aiying Ji, Lifeng Jiang, Feng Sang, Fucheng Li

Abstract

miR-135a was downregulated in the majority of human primary gastric cancer (GC) tissues and GC cell lines. Kinesin family member C1 (KIFC1) was significantly upregulated in GC tissues and cell lines and promoted GC development and progression. We searched for miR-135a targets by using MiRanda, TargetScan, and PicTar tools, and found that KIFC1 was a potential target of miR-135a. Based on these findings, we speculated that miR-135a might target KIFC1 to inhibit GC growth. We determined the expression of miR-135a and KIFC1 by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blot assays, respectively, and found downregulation of miR-135a and upregulation of KIFC1 in GC tissues and cell lines. Cell proliferation and apoptosis assays showed that knockdown of KIFC1 inhibited proliferation and promoted apoptosis of GC cells, and miR-135a mimics had similar effects on GC cell proliferation and apoptosis. Furthermore, we verified that KIFC1 was a direct target of miR-135a, which confirmed our speculation that the functional effect of miR-135a on GC cells, at least, in part, depends on KIFC1. These findings suggest that miR-135a has an important role in the suppression of GC and presents a novel mechanism of miRNA-mediated KIFC1 expression in cancer cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 56%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#2,078
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,346
of 353,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#77
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.