↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Children’s Sleep Comic: development of a new diagnostic tool for children with sleep disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Nature and science of sleep, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Children’s Sleep Comic: development of a new diagnostic tool for children with sleep disorders
Published in
Nature and science of sleep, August 2012
DOI 10.2147/nss.s33127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Schwerdtle, Julia Kanis, Lena Kahl, Andrea Kübler, Angelika A Schlarb

Abstract

A solid diagnosis of sleep disorders in children should include both self-ratings and parent ratings. However, there are few standardized self-assessment instruments to meet this need. The Children's Sleep Comic is an adapted version of the unpublished German questionnaire "Freiburger Kinderschlafcomic" and provides pictures for items and responses. Because the drawings were outdated and allowed only for qualitative analysis, we revised the comic, tested its applicability in a target sample, and suggest a procedure for quantitative analysis. All items were updated and pictures were newly drawn. We used a sample of 201 children aged 5-10 years to test the applicability of the Children's Sleep Comic in young children and to run a preliminary analysis. The Children's Sleep Comic comprises 37 items covering relevant aspects of sleep disorders in children. Application took on average 30 minutes. The procedure was well accepted by the children, as reflected by the absence of any dropouts. First comparisons with established questionnaires indicated moderate correlations. The Children's Sleep Comic is appropriate for screening sleep behavior and sleep problems in children. The interactive procedure can foster a good relationship between the investigator and the child, and thus establish the basis for successful intervention if necessary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 5%
Italy 1 5%
Australia 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Professor 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Neuroscience 3 14%
Psychology 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,087,804
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Nature and science of sleep
#416
of 633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,611
of 179,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature and science of sleep
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.