| Title |
Properties of Thermal Analgesia in a Human Chronic Low Back Pain Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s260967 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles Chabal, Peter J Dunbar, Ian Painter, Douglas Young, Darah C Chabal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,013,048
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#345
of 1,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,258
of 398,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.