The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Test–retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s158847 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ahmad H Alghadir, Shahnawaz Anwer, Amir Iqbal, Zaheen Ahmed Iqbal |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,094 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1094 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 172 | 16% |
Student > Master | 120 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 45 | 4% |
Researcher | 36 | 3% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 3% |
Other | 124 | 11% |
Unknown | 561 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 212 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 50 | 5% |
Unspecified | 18 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 13 | 1% |
Other | 75 | 7% |
Unknown | 598 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,666,620
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#947
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,887
of 346,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#23
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.