↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Evaluation Of The Efficacy Of Fluorescent Staining And Chicago Sky Blue Staining As Methods For Diagnosis Of Dermatophytosis In Hair And Nails

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation Of The Efficacy Of Fluorescent Staining And Chicago Sky Blue Staining As Methods For Diagnosis Of Dermatophytosis In Hair And Nails
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, October 2019
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s215661
Pubmed ID
Authors

Basma Mourad, Mayada Ismail, Soha Hawwam, Mina Msseha, Reham Hassan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#718
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,305
of 362,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.