Title |
International survey of methods used in health technology assessment (HTA): does practice meet the principles proposed for good research?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Comparative Effectiveness Research, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/cer.s22984 |
Authors |
Jennifer Stephens, Hanke, Jalpa Doshi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 116 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 17% |
Researcher | 20 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 23% |
Unknown | 15 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 32% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 20% |
Unknown | 20 | 16% |