↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A prospective study of atopic dermatitis managed without topical corticosteroids for a 6-month period

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
70 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
A prospective study of atopic dermatitis managed without topical corticosteroids for a 6-month period
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, July 2016
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s109946
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mototsugu Fukaya, Kenji Sato, Takahiro Yamada, Mitsuko Sato, Shigeki Fujisawa, Satoko Minaguchi, Hajime Kimata, Haruhiko Dozono

Abstract

Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are regarded as the mainstay treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD). As AD has a tendency to heal naturally, the long-term efficacy of TCS in AD management should be compared with the outcomes seen in patients with AD not using TCS. However, there are few long-term studies that consider patients with AD not using TCS. We designed a prospective multicenter cohort study to assess the clinical outcomes in patients with AD who did not use TCS for 6 months and then compared our results with an earlier study by Furue et al which considered AD patients using TCS over 6 months. Our patients' clinical improvement was comparable with the patients described in Furue's research. In light of this, it is reasonable for physicians to manage AD patients who decline TCS, as the expected long-term prognosis is similar whether they use TCS or not.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Lecturer 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2023.
All research outputs
#711,338
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#74
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,661
of 368,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.