↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Optimal management of genital herpes: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Optimal management of genital herpes: current perspectives
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, June 2016
DOI 10.2147/idr.s96164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Sauerbrei

Abstract

As one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases, genital herpes is a global medical problem with significant physical and psychological morbidity. Genital herpes is caused by herpes simplex virus type 1 or type 2 and can manifest as primary and/or recurrent infection. This manuscript provides an overview about the fundamental knowledge on the virus, its epidemiology, and infection. Furthermore, the current possibilities of antiviral therapeutic interventions and laboratory diagnosis of genital herpes as well as the present situation and perspectives for the treatment by novel antivirals and prevention of disease by vaccination are presented. Since the medical management of patients with genital herpes simplex virus infection is often unsatisfactory, this review aims at all physicians and health professionals who are involved in the care of patients with genital herpes. The information provided would help to improve the counseling of affected patients and to optimize the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of this particular disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,008,626
of 24,384,776 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#70
of 1,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,033
of 345,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,384,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them